Sophos Or Avast For Mac
- Pros
Remote management. Detected many Windows malware samples in hands-on test. Decent phishing protection. Simple parental control. Free.
- Cons
No scores from independent labs. Limited content filter missed some racy sites. Very slow full scan. Phishing score lags Windows edition.
- Bottom Line
Sophos Home Free (for Mac) keeps configuration to a minimum, but doesn't have independent test scores to verify its accuracy. It can be a good choice for protecting your Macs at no cost.
PCs get viruses, Macs don't. You know it's true—you saw it on TV! Alas, the reality is a bit different from that. Yes, Windows is more popular with malware coders around the world, because it offers more of an attack surface. You'd be nuts to go without antivirus protection on your Windows boxes. But Macs need protection too, especially from ransomware. If you're willing to protect your Macs with antivirus but don't want to lay out cash for that purpose, consider Sophos Home Free (for Mac), especially if you need to manage protection for others.
- $0.00
- $39.99
- $39.99
- $49.99
- $39.99
- $59.99
- $99.99
- $39.95
- $39.99
- $29.95
- $44.99
- $0.00
Hello there I wanted to run Avast for Mac and Sophos on my Mac running Snow Leopard 10.6.8. I like Avast but Sophos also covers Windows viruses which Avast does not. Feb 20, 2015 It is false to assume mac does not need protection, the simplest case being that malware are using browser as a vector of attack (hence both avast and sophos has web shield that scan the webpage) Click to expand. Sophos & Avast (Mac) For personally owned Mac computers, the free online Sophos or Avast anti-virus software is recommended. Download Sophos at www.sophos.com. Download Avast at www.avast.com. The University of Texas at Austin has licensed MATLAB, Simulink, and 23 companion toolboxes for the campus under the MathWorks Total Academic. When it comes to Sophos Antivirus for Mac Home Edition, the product is developed by a British cybersecurity software and hardware provider Sophos Group Plc. The company is known for its security and privacy products and services, next-gen network protection, mobile security and management, endpoint protection for home and business users. Avast vs Sophos Mac security apps on test Posted: March 11, 2016 The recent ransomware attack on Apple Macs has brought security to the forefront of the Mac community and you might be thinking it is time to install Mac security software to keep your computer safe from malicious threats.
The big business for Sophos is Enterprise-level antivirus systems, where an IT administrator controls all the local installations. It's no surprise that the consumer edition works the same way. To get started with Sophos, you register an account online. From the online console you can install and manage protection on three devices, whether they run macOS or Windows. If you need more than three and don't want to set up another free account on a separate email, you must upgrade to Sophos Home Premium (for Mac). The Premium edition lets you manage 10 devices, and adds useful security-related features.
Sophos installed in a flash on the MacBook Air I use for testing. The product was ready to use, including all the latest antivirus signature updates, within a minute or two.
Is avast premier for mac. • Minimum Processor: Intel Pentium 4. How to get Avast Free Antivirus Activation Code 2018 for 1 Year: • First of all, you need to download Avast free antivirus from below Link.
With Sophos Home Free on Windows, you see the small, simple window of a local antivirus agent, with all logging and configuration happening online. The Mac edition goes a step beyond. It has no main window—just a tiny pop-up invoked by clicking its icon. The pop-up reports security status, lists recent activity, and serves as a progress display when you're running a scan. From its menu you can manage your devices, view all activity, or configure preferences; selecting any of these three sends you to the online dashboard.
The Windows antivirus always runs a full scan, while the default on a Mac is a quick scan. You can check a box to make it a full scan, and you should do that at least once after installation, to wipe out any preexisting malware conditions.
Pricing and OS Support
It's true that the number of malware attacks on macOS devices pales next to the huge number aimed at Windows, so you might be tempted to skip antivirus on the Mac. Why invest in protection you might not need? But installing Sophos on your personal Macs requires no investment beyond a few minutes of your time. Avast, Avira, and AVG also offer free antivirus protection for the Mac. Avira Free Antivirus for Mac, in particular, has no restrictions on number of installations and doesn't require that you register.
For comparison, non-free macOS antivirus utilities typically go for about $40 per year, or $60 for three licenses. McAfee AntiVirus Plus (for Mac) takes a different approach. Your $59.99 subscription lets you install protection on every Mac in your household, as well as any devices running Windows, Android, or iOS.
Apple makes keeping your operating system updated really easy, whether it's iOS or macOS. Most Mac users migrate to the latest as soon as it's available. For those lagging just a little, Sophos supports macOS versions from El Capitan (10.11) to the latest. Avira also required El Capitan, while Avast Security (for Mac) and AVG go back to Yosemite (10.10).
If you're stuck using an old Mac that can't handle the latest updates, you may need a commercial antivirus. Webroot is compatible with versions back to Lion (10.7). That's impressive, but ProtectWorks AntiVirus (for Mac) goes even farther, with support for Snow Leopard (10.6) and later.
Online Dashboard
Other than real-time protection and antivirus scans, everything about this product takes place in the online console. Clicking Manage Devices, Show All Activity, or Preferences from the menu takes you to the console. From any computer, Windows or Mac, you can log into the console online and install Sophos Free (provided you haven't used up your three licenses).
Clicking an existing device from the console brings up activities and settings for that device. In the free edition, only Antivirus Protection and Web Protection are enabled. If you want Ransomware Protection, Privacy Protection, and Malicious Traffic Detection, you'll have to upgrade to Premium.
Settings are almost identical on Windows and macOS installations. The one significant difference is the feature called Download Reputation. On Windows devices, this feature works to double-check files that the regular real-time protection system doesn't catch. It checks each download against an online reputation database that considers the source website, content, and feedback from other protected computers. If the reputation is bad, Sophos offers to kill the download. That feature doesn't appear in the macOS edition.
No Test Results From the Labs
If you're looking for a new computer, you probably peruse PCMag's reviews to find out which one scores best in various feature areas. I do something similar when reviewing antivirus utilities, checking results from the big independent testing labs. I follow four labs that regularly publish test results for Windows antivirus utilities, and two of those also cover Mac antivirus.
When I first put it to the test, Sophos held Mac certification from AV-Comparatives. In fact, all the products in my initial round of Mac antivirus reviews had at least one certification.
Unfortunately, Sophos doesn't appear in current reports from either AV-Comparatives or AV-Test Institute. As you can see from the chart, that's true for about half the products I've reviewed. It's not a reflection on the products that don't appear. The test labs regularly shuffle the sample sets for their reports. But the absence of independent certification does make it hard for me to determine whether a Mac antivirus utility is effective.
Bitdefender, Intego Mac Internet Security X9, and Trend Micro earned certification from both labs, and took top scores. Kaspersky came close to perfect marks, but lost a half-point for Performance, from AV-Test.
Scanning and Scheduling
I always advise running a full scan after installing any antivirus utility, to make sure there's no malware lurking on the system. After that initial full scan, you can probably rely on real-time protection to handle any new attacks. If you're at all worried, you can schedule a full or quick scan for any day of the week, just as with the Windows edition.
When I last tested this utility, it ran a full scan in 20 minutes, a little better than average for scan time on this Mac test system. I don't know what changed, but this time around that full scan took more than two hours. A second scan took just as long. That's longer than any recent product, though ESET did require an hour and a half. At the quick end of the scale, Webroot SecureAnywhere Antivirus (for Mac) only needed two and a half minutes to complete its full scan, and Trend Micro did the job in 10 minutes.
I still advise a full scan after installing Sophos, but perhaps one time is enough. That full scan did detect malware hiding in odd places like the trash and some cache folders, including quarantine folders left over from long-deleted installations of other products.
Malware written to attack Windows machines can't affect Macs, and vice versa. Even so, most Mac antivirus tools also wipe out any Windows malware they find. That eliminates the faint possibility that your Mac might act as a carrier, passing malware along to Windows boxes on your network. Sophos is among those products that aim to kill off any Windows malware they see.
To test this feature, I copied my Windows malware samples to a thumb drive and mounted it on the Mac. Sophos immediately started popping up notifications about threats blocked. For known threats, the pop-up came with just a Close button; pop-ups for lower-risk PUAs offered a choice, Close or Clean. I always clicked Clean.
This deluge of pop-ups went on for at least 10 minutes, totaling vastly more notifications than the actual number of samples. I could see some of the same ones showing up over and over. When the pop-up storm finally subsided, Sophos had removed 86 percent of the Windows malware. That's pretty good, but when last tested it caught 100 percent of the then-current sample set. Webroot also whacked 100 percent of those samples.
As noted, Sophos started scanning the contents of the USB drive as soon as I mounted it. If you want to launch a scan of any folder, including folders on a removable drive, you can Control+Click and choose Scan with Sophos Home from the menu.
Decent Phishing Protection
It's possible to craft a website that drops malware on every visitor, or performs other dirty deeds. However, doing so isn't easy, and the result tends to be OS-specific. It's a lot easier to build a phishing website and just wait for saps to hand you their security credentials. A phishing site duplicates the appearance of a secure site such as a bank, a gaming site, or even an online dating site. It looks totally legit, unless you notice the wrong URL in the address bar or some other sign recognizing a phishing scam can be tough. And phishing is completely platform-agnostic. If you enter your username and password, they go straight into the hot little hands of the scammer. In most cases, the fraudulent site passes your login along to the real thing, so you don't even know you've been pwned.
Unlike most Mac antivirus products, Sophos doesn't rely on a browser add-on to filter out malicious and fraudulent URLs. It does it work below the browser level, so it works even if you've chosen an off-brand browser.
There's one slightly awkward side effect of this browser-independent technology. If the fraudulent site uses HTTPS, Sophos can't replace the page with a warning. When this happens on Windows, the browser displays an error message and Sophos tells you what happened with a pop-up. On the Mac, you just see an error message. I had to dig into the activity log to identify which errors reflected blocking a secure URL and which were just plain errors.
Interestingly, the two Sophos editions didn't quite come up with the same results. The macOS edition missed some fraudulent pages that the Windows edition caught. It also caught a few that the Windows edition missed, but not nearly as many.
Sophos detected 82 percent of the verified phishing URLs, which is decent but not stellar. It beat Firefox and Internet Explorer, but lagged seven percentage points behind Chrome. Tested simultaneously, the Windows edition managed 91 percent detection.
Phishing websites are platform-independent, but clearly phishing protection needn't be. It's common for a Mac antivirus to lag behind its Windows equivalent in this test. However, there are exceptions. McAfee and Webroot scored precisely the same as their Windows equivalents, with 100 percent and 97 percent detection respectively.
Porous Web Content Filtering
As with the Windows edition, Sophos offers a very simple parental control web content filter, managed from the online console. Filtering is by device, with no option to exempt certain user accounts. For each of 28 content categories, you can choose to block all access, or to just warn that proceeding to the site is inadvisable and will be logged.
I tried connecting with a few dozen raunchy sites. To my surprise, several got past the filter, including some that Sophos caught on Windows. I did find that since my last review, Sophos added the ability to filter unwanted HTTPS websites. However, it can't display its usual warning for these, and doesn't pop up a notification the way it does on Windows. A blocked HTTPS porn page just causes an error message in the browser.
As with the Windows edition, if you choose to warn about inappropriate sites rather than block them, Sophos doesn't handle HTTPS sites. I had no trouble connecting with HTTPS porn sites. In this mode, a tech-savvy youngster could connect through a secure anonymizing proxy and completely evade all parental control and monitoring. The limited parental control system offered by Trend Micro Antivirus for Mac is also foiled by anonymizing proxies.
On Windows, content filtering only works in supported browsers (Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Internet Explorer, and Opera). I found that I could ignore the filter completely by browsing with Vivaldi. On the Mac, the filter seems to be browser-independent. At least, it blocked pages in Safari, Chrome, and Vivaldi.
If you really want parental control served up with your Mac antivirus, Kaspersky Internet Security for Mac is your best bet. It includes content filtering, time scheduling, and more. As for the limited, porous content filter in Sophos, it's not worth your time.
Free and Easy
Sophos Home Free has shrunk its Mac edition down to a menu bar button with a tiny pop-up window. All the settings and logs reside online. Alas, the independent labs no longer include it in testing, so it's hard to be sure of its effectiveness. It earns a decent score in our phishing protection test, and detects most (but not all) of our Windows malware samples. The addition of a parental control content filter looks like a bonus, until you see that it has numerous problems.
Bitdefender Antivirus for Mac and Kaspersky Internet Security for Mac earned certification from both independent testing labs, and both offer features beyond basic antivirus. Bitdefender marks dangerous links in search results and protects your sensitive documents against ransomware attack. Kaspersky goes full-on security suite, with network defense, privacy protection, parental control, and more. Bitdefender and Kaspersky are our Editors' Choice picks for Mac antivirus protection. If you just can't justify paying for Mac antivirus, look at Avast Security (for Mac) or Avira Free Antivirus for Mac. These two earned certification from both labs, though not with the very highest scores.
Bottom Line: Sophos Home Free (for Mac) keeps configuration to a minimum, but doesn't have independent test scores to verify its accuracy. It can be a good choice for protecting your Macs at no cost.
- $60.00
- $60.00
- $0.00
- $0.00
- Pros
Certified by one antivirus testing lab. Good detection of Windows malware. Clear, simple user interface. Free.
- Cons
Very poor score in hands-on phishing protection test. Lacks scheduled scanning, website rating, and other features found in competing free apps.
- Bottom Line
The free AVG AntiVirus protects against Mac, Windows, and mobile malware, but that's about all, and its antiphishing component tanked in our hands-on testing.
'Ok, ok,' you say, 'you've convinced me. I'll install an antivirus app on my Mac. But I'll be goldarned if I'm gonna pay for it!' That's actually quite a reasonable attitude. Sure, you get more and better protection from the best commercial products, but while Mac-centered malware totally exists, it doesn't come close to the wild and woolly jungle of Windows malware. AVG AntiVirus for Mac is one of several totally free antivirus solutions to protect your Macs. It takes care of basic antivirus protection, but its protection against malicious and fraudulent URLs currently leaves much to be desired.
- $0.00
- $0.00
- $0.00
- $39.99
- $39.99
- $99.99
- $39.99
- $60.00
- $39.95
- $39.99
- $29.95
- $49.99
- $39.99
- $59.99
- $44.99
Since Avast's acquisition of AVG a couple years ago, this product and Avast Security (for Mac) are now, if not siblings, at least cousins. On the PC side, the two free antivirus products are extremely similar under the hood, and my company contacts assure me that the same is true of the Mac products. Note, though, that Avast offers Mac users a lot more than AVG does. In addition to basic antivirus protection, it includes site rating, active Do Not Track functionality, a network security scanner, and even a basic password manager.
AVG's main window is spacious and simple. A large dark grey expanse holds three icons penned in by a darker rectangle: Mac Shield, Web Shield, and Email Shield. Mac Shield refers to real-time protection, scanning new files as they arrive. Web Shield works to divert your browsing away from malicious or fraudulent pages. The third icon, Email Shield, will eventually scan incoming email attachments for malware, but the feature is not yet ready. Don't worry; the moment you attempt to save or launch an attachment, the Mac Shield scans it.
You can use the Scan Mac button at center bottom to launch various types of antivirus scans. Links to view quarantined items and log in to your AVG account round out the window. Choosing File Preferences from the menu lets you tweak a few minor settings. For most users the defaults are fine, with one exception. Like Avast, AVG can scan your Time Machine backups for malware. Out of the box, this feature is disabled; turning it on seems like a good idea.
Pricing and OS Support
Like Sophos and McAfee, AVG requires macOS 10.10 (Yosemite) or higher. Avira and Norton want 10.11 (El Capitan) or higher. If you're a prudent user who always accepts operating system upgrades, this shouldn't be a problem. However, if for some reason you're stuck using an old macOS version, consider ClamXAV, ProtectWorks, or ESET Cyber Security (for Mac). These three can handle versions all the way back to 10.6 (Snow Leopard).
As noted, AVG is completely free. Sophos Home Free (for Mac), Avast, and Avira are among the other vendors offering free antivirus for macOS. However, like Avast, AVG is only free for noncommercial use. If you want to use AVG in a business setting, you must pony up for the business edition.
Commercial Mac antivirus pricing centers on just under $40 per year for a single license. Half of the current products fit that model, and most of those give you three licenses for $59.99 per year. With McAfee, that $59.99 subscription price gets you unlimited licenses, not just three. You can install McAfee AntiVirus Plus (for Mac) on all the macOS, Windows, Android, and iOS devices in your household.
Good Malware Protection Scores
When reviewing Windows antivirus utilities, I look at test results from four independent labs, and I also perform my own hand-on testing with live malware. That's not as dangerous as it sounds. I use virtual machines, so if malware wreaks havoc, I just revert to an earlier snapshot. I don't perform that level of testing on macOS, so results from the two labs that test Mac antivirus become very important.
As I mentioned, Avast now owns AVG, so I wasn't surprised to see that the two earned precisely the same scores from AV-Comparatives. Both protected against 99.90 percent of the lab's Mac malware samples, detected 100 percent of the Windows malware samples, and earned this lab's certification.
AV-Test Institute also included Avast in its latest report, but not AVG. Avast detected all the Mac malware and PUAs (Potentially Unwanted Applications) and most of the Windows malware. We can hope that AVG would have scored the same, but the labs are very clear: results apply only to the precise product tested.
Bitdefender and Kaspersky Internet Security for Mac are the big winners, as far as lab results go. They received certification from both labs, earning 100 percent protection against Mac malware in both cases.
Scan Choices
If you just click the big Scan Mac button, AVG scans the most likely places for malware traces. On the Apple MacBook Air 13-Inch I use for testing, this scan finished in less than four minutes. Clicking the gear icon next to Scan Mac lets you choose a Deep Scan of the entire system, or a File Scan looking just at certain files or folders. Even the Deep Scan only took 15 minutes, just a hair longer than Avast, and well below the current average of 24 minutes.
Avast, Avira Free Antivirus for Mac, ClamXAV, and several others include the option to define a scan schedule. AVG, like Sophos, Malwarebytes, and a few others, eschews the scheduled scan, figuring that real-time protection should handle any new threats. I suggest that you run a Deep Scan immediately after installing AVG, to root out any hidden nasties.
Almost all the Mac antivirus utilities I've reviewed include the ability to detect Windows malware as well. True, malware designed for Windows can't run on a Mac, but eliminating it means there's no chance of it somehow leapfrogging to a Windows system on your network. AVG promises to detect and remove Windows and mobile malware, in addition to malware aimed at macOS.
To test AVG's skills against Windows malware, I copied my current malware collection from a thumb drive to the desktop. AVG immediately started wiping out the samples, leaving just a handful. A File Scan on the folder eliminated a few more, for a total of 86 percent. Interestingly, I tested Avast with my previous malware collection and it weighed in at 85 percent, almost the same. Sophos has the best score this test, with 100 percent of Windows malware eliminated.
Poor Phishing Protection
While viruses, Trojans, and other typical types of malware necessarily target a specific operating system, phishing attacks are totally platform-agnostic. If you log in to a fraudulent site, thereby giving the fraudsters your credentials for the actual site, it doesn't matter if you did it on a PC, a Mac, or a browser-equipped refrigerator. Whatever the platform, you've lost control of that account.
My phishing test starts with hundreds of suspected phishing URLs, scraped from websites that specialize in tracking and reporting on them. To test a Windows-based product, I set up five browsers, one protected by the product under test, one by phishing champ Symantec Norton AntiVirus Basic, and one each by the protection built into Chrome, Firefox, and Internet Explorer. I wrote a simple program to launch each URL simultaneously in all five, and record with one click whether it blocked or missed a fraud, or whether the URL turned out not to be a phishing fraud after all. Alas, my handy program runs strictly on Windows, so my antiphish testing on macOS is a manual cut and paste affair.
In my testing, I've learned that while phishing frauds themselves are platform-independent, defense against phishing is not. Reviews avast cleanup pro for mac. Symantec Norton Security Deluxe (for Mac) scored quite a bit lower in this test than the comparable Windows edition.
Many phishing protection systems replace the fraudulent page with a warning message in the browser, explaining that proceeding to the site would be dangerous, but allowing the user to override the warning. AVG's Web Shield works quite differently. It pops up a window reporting that it secured a threat, leaving the browser to display a simple error message.
When I finished the test and ran the numbers for AVG, I was a bit shocked. AVG's detection rate was 39 percent lower than Norton's, and all three browsers beat it handily using their built-in protection. Among Mac antivirus products, only Avira has done worse, running 47 percent below Norton's detection rate. On the plus side, this is significantly better than the score earned by AVG AntiVirus Free.
Then I remembered that I had a similar experience with Avast. Initially it scored 32 percentage points behind Norton, which is in the same ballpark as AVG's 39 points. At that time, my Avast contact explained that Safari gets protection only from the Web Shield component, while browser extensions offer enhanced protection in Chrome and Firefox. When I repeated the test using Chrome, Avast tied with Norton and beat all three browsers. Only Bitdefender Antivirus for Mac has done better, outscoring Norton by 5 percentage points. Bitdefender on Windows did even better, 12 points above Norton.
Alas, browser extensions for AVG's Mac antivirus aren't yet ready, so phishing protection totally relies on the less-effective Web Shield component. I'll revisit this review when the browser extensions come out.
What's Not Here
AVG covers the basics, with protection against Mac, Windows, and mobile malware. It offers a modicum of protection against phishing frauds, though this component isn't very effective. And that's about all. Other free Mac antivirus utilities bring quite a bit more to the party.
With Sophos, you get full remote management of up to three installations, so you can fix Uncle Ernie's antivirus without driving across town. It also includes a simple content filter for parental control.
Avira rates links in search results, so you don't accidentally visit a dangerous page. By default, it runs a scheduled scan every week. It brings along a raft of other security-related components, some free, others free trial.
Sophos Home Premium For Mac
AVG's cousin Avast also rates the safety of search result links. Its active Do Not Track component prevents advertisers and other trackers from building a profile of your online activity. The network security scan lists all the devices on your network and flags any that have security problems. It even includes a basic password manager.
You Can Do Better
As you can see, AVG Antivirus for Mac suffers by comparison with other free Mac antivirus utilities. Lab tests show that it does its essential job, protecting against malware, but it's not effective at blocking malicious or fraudulent URLs. Its biggest virtue lies in its extremely simple, streamlined user interface.
Those willing to pay for Mac antivirus protection can get significantly better protection. Bitdefender Antivirus for Mac and Kaspersky Internet Security for Mac both cost $59.99 for three licenses, and both earn top ratings from the independent labs. Bitdefender took the top score in our antiphishing test, and its ransomware protection feature prevents unauthorized apps from modifying your important files. Kaspersky goes beyond the basics with an effective parental control system, protection against webcam spyware, a network attack blocker, and more. As in the Windows realm, free antivirus tools for Mac handle the basics, but commercial ones do much more.
Sophos Download
Bottom Line: The free AVG AntiVirus protects against Mac, Windows, and mobile malware, but that's about all, and its antiphishing component tanked in our hands-on testing.
- $49.99
- $79.99
- $0.00
- $69.99